Journal of Public Policy and Administration

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

The Influence of Performance Management on Staff Performance: A Case of Two Bureaucracies in Federal Public Service of Nigeria

Management by Objective (MBO) theory suggests that for any organization to derive the best performance from the employees the components of performance management must be practiced. To investigate whether this argument applies to the public service organizations that have undergone performance reform, this study explores the influence of performance management on employees’ performance in the FCS and NNPC of the federal public service of Nigeria. Data were obtained from management staff in FCS and NNPC in Nigeria and analyzed with t-test and multiple regression. The results showed that there is no significant difference between methods of performance appraisal in NNPC and FCS. It also revealed that the components of performance management such as training mechanisms and feedback on employees' performance among others have a significant influence on employees’ performance. The study concluded that even though performance management influenced employees’ efficiency, job satisfaction, productivity, and quality of services; the weaknesses diagnosed from employees’ appraisal forms are not often linked with employees’ training and development in both organizations. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Performance Management, Performance Appraisal, Employees’ Performance, Human Resource Management, Public Service

APA Style

Ogbewere Bankole Ijewereme. (2023). The Influence of Performance Management on Staff Performance: A Case of Two Bureaucracies in Federal Public Service of Nigeria. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 7(2), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.18

ACS Style

Ogbewere Bankole Ijewereme. The Influence of Performance Management on Staff Performance: A Case of Two Bureaucracies in Federal Public Service of Nigeria. J. Public Policy Adm. 2023, 7(2), 98-108. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.18

AMA Style

Ogbewere Bankole Ijewereme. The Influence of Performance Management on Staff Performance: A Case of Two Bureaucracies in Federal Public Service of Nigeria. J Public Policy Adm. 2023;7(2):98-108. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.18

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Ali K. A. (2017). Relationship between SHRM and Organizational Performance among Iraqi Oil Companies. Journal of Global Economy 5: 241. doi 10.4172/2375-4389.1000241.
2. Aguinis H, Joo H, Gottfredson R. K. (2011). Why we hate performance management—And why we should love it. Business Horizons 54: 503-507.
3. Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance management in the public sector: The ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31 (1), 1–22.
4. Andrews, R. (2010). New Public Management and the Search for efficiency. In T. Christensen & P. Laegrid (Eds.), Ashgate research companion to the New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
5. Andrews, R. (2014). Performance management and public service improvement. Public Policy Institute for Wales, PPIW Report No. 3.
6. Armstrong M (2001). Human Resource Management Practice, Kogan Page Publishers, 8th edition.
7. Banjoko. S. A. (1982). Employee Performance Appraisal; Pennan Vol. 8, No. 3, July-Sept, Pp. 65–70.
8. Banjoko, S. A. (2002). Human Resource Management: An expository approach, Ibadan: Pumark publication.
9. Benson, K. S. (2010). Administrative System and Public Service Reform in Nigeria: Implications and challenges, International Journal of Studies in the Humanities, 7 (8), Pp137–138.
10. Boyne, G. A. (2010). Performance management: Does it work? In R. M. Walker, G. A. Boyne, & G. A. Brewer (Eds.), Public management performance: Research directions (p. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Brumbach, G. B. (2003). ‘’Blending the We/Me in Performance Management: Team Performance’, International Journal 9 (7/8) pp167–173.
12. Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance: International comparisons. New York: Routledge.
13. Davis, R. (1995). Choosing performance management: A holistic approach journal. New Delhi, CUPA Publication.
14. Ekpe, A. N., Daniel, E. E., and Ekpe, M. A. (2013). Analysis of Performance Appraisal System of the Nigerian Public Sector Organizations. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Volume 18, Issue 3, PP 49-54.
15. Ferris, G., Munyon, T. & Basik-Buckley, M. (2008). The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political and relationship components: Human Resource Management Review, 5 (1), P. 18.
16. Frank V. Cespedes (2022). How to Conduct a Great Performance Review. https://hbr.org/2022/07/how-to-conduct-a-great-performance-review
17. Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 76 (1), 48–66.
18. Heinrich, C. J. (2007). False or fitting recognition? The use of high-performance bonuses in motivating organizational achievements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 281–304.
19. Heinrich, C. J., and Marschke, G. (2010). Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29 (1), 183–208.
20. Holzer, M., & Yang, K. (2004). Performance measurement and improvement: An assessment of the state of the art. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70, 15–31.
21. Huber, V. L. (1983). An analysis of performance appraisal practices in the public sector: a review and recommendations, Public Personnel Management Journal, Vol. 12 pp. 258–67.
22. Hvidman, U., & Andersen, S. C. (2013). The impact of performance management in public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, p. 35–58.
23. Ijewereme, O. B. & Dunmade, E. O. (2014). Goal Setting and Performance Appraisal in Nigerian Public Enterprises: An Empirical Study of Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). Public Policy and Administration Research, 4 (9), pp 44–50.
24. Ijewereme, O. B. (2014). Comparative Study of Performance Appraisal in Edo and Ondo States Civil Service of Nigeria. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis Submitted to Post-graduate College, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.
25. Ijewereme, O. B. (2018). Strategic Planning and Performance in the Federal Civil Service of Nigeria (2004-2015). (Ph. D’s thesis), in Public Administration Submitted to Post-graduate College, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.
26. Jiang K, Lepak DP, Hu J, Baer JC (2012) How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal 55: 1264–1294.
27. Kim, T., and Holzer, M. (2016). Public Employees and Performance Appraisal: A Study of Antecedents to Employees’ Perception of the Process. Review of Public Personnel Administration 36 (1) 31–56, DOI: 10.1177/0734371X14549673.
28. Latham, G. P., and Wexley, K. N. (1977), “Behavioral observation scales”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 1 (30), pp. 255–68.
29. Longenecker, C. O. (1997). Why managerial performance appraisals are ineffective: Causes and lessons, Journal of Career Development International, 2 (5), pp. 212–218.
30. Locke, E. A. (1968). Towards a theory of task motivation incentives. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 3, 157–189.
31. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. G. (2011). Comparing public and private management: Theoretical expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, p. 283–299.
32. Messah, O. B, and Kamencu, S. M. (2011). The Effect of Performance Appraisal System on Employees in Kenya Tea Development Agency: A Survey of Selected Tea Factories in Meru County-Kenya, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2 (3), 20–23.
33. Mizrachi, S. (2017). Mizrahi, Public Policy and Performance Management in Democratic Systems: Theory and Practice DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52350-7_2.
34. Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management constructing information and reform, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
35. Mullins, J. L. (2013) Management and Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education, Harlow.
36. Nganga R, Wanjiku PN, Sakwa M (2013) The Link between Performance Appraisal and Firm Performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 3: 46–56.
37. Obisi, C. (2011). Employee Performance Appraisal and its Implication for Individual and Organizational Growth, Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1 (9), pp 92–97.
38. OECD. (2013). Government briefly. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docser ver/download/4213201e.pdf?expires=1476352769&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A2F3B05BC2F054481949FC65AD8BD385.
39. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2010). Public management reform: A comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Rajala, T. Laihonen, H and Vakkuri, J. (2018). Shifting from Output to Outcome Measurement in Public Administration-Arguments Revisited, in E. Borgonovi et al. (eds.), Outcome-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector, System Dynamics for Performance Management 2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57018-1_1.
41. Rothstein, R. (2008). Holding accountability to account: How scholarship and experience in other fields inform exploration of performance incentives in education. National Center on Performance Incentives Working paper 2008–2004, Vanderbilt University, Peabody College.
42. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I, Kraiger, K., Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the public interest 13: 74–101.
43. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). The measurement of economic performance and social progress was revised. OFCE, Paris. Downloaded from: www.stiglitzsenfitoussi.fr/documents/overview-eng.pdf.
44. St-Onge, S., Morin, D., Bellehumeur, M. & Dupuis, F. (2009). Manager’s Motivation to Evaluate Subordinate Performance: Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, International Journal of Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp -273–293.
45. Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Verbeeten, F. H. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21: 427–454.
47. Walsh, W. F. (1986). Performance evaluation in small and medium police departments: a supervisory perspective, American Journal of Police, Vol. 5 pp. 91–109.
48. Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., & Brewer, G. A. (Eds.). (2010). Public management performance: Research directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) Research Project. (2013). The World Bank. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home.
50. Wright, P., Gardner, T., Moynihan L. M. (2003). The impact of human resource practices on business unit operating and financial performance. Human Resource Management Journal 13: 21–36.